Most compatibility tests ask one person how the relationship is going. This one asks both of you the same 24, 45 or 70 questions with neither of you able to see the other’s answers, then scores the gap between the two sets. The number at the top is not a personality read — it is the share of moments you two describe the same way.
Agreement, not affection. Every question is a “who?” — who apologises first, who plans things, who notices the fridge is empty — so each one produces two answers that either match or don’t. The score is the share that match, weighted by how far apart the mismatches are: “both of us, evenly” from one of you and “mostly me” from the other is a smaller gap than the two of you pointing at each other. That is why it cannot be talked up, and why a couple who agree they are struggling can still score high.
A test you fill in together becomes a negotiation — someone softens an answer, someone else agrees to keep the peace, and the result describes the conversation instead of the relationship. Here one of you answers, the screen goes blank behind a cover, and the other answers blind. Neither of you sees a single answer until the report. Nothing to game, because there is nothing to see.
A compatibility score with a couple type behind it, a green flag score for each of you, the strengths that came out on top, playful “who’s more likely to” comparisons, and — at the deeper levels — communication, trust, conflict style, love language, emotional support, money, future goals and the roles you each play. Sections only appear when enough of your answers support them, so nothing is invented to fill a page.
It means you two describe the same evenings differently, which is the most useful thing a test like this can tell you. The report is built to be readable by both people in the room: nobody is called toxic, nobody is named the villain, and every result points at a behaviour rather than a person. It is a quiz, not a diagnosis, and the report says so at the bottom.
The test, the compatibility score, your couple type, the green flag score, your top strengths and the comparisons cost nothing and need no account. One optional payment unlocks the deeper report sections, and it covers both of you.
Treat it as a well-built conversation starter, not a measurement. The questions are drawn from established couples research — Gottman’s conflict work, attribution research in marriage, the demand–withdraw pattern — and the scoring is transparent: it is agreement between your two answer sets. What it cannot do is know anything about you that neither of you answered.
Yes. Answer your half, send the link, and they answer theirs on their own phone. The report builds once both halves are in, and you both open the same one.
Most couples land between 60% and 85%. Above that usually means a long shared history and a settled division of who does what; below it usually means the two of you are describing the same events differently, which is worth an evening of talking rather than an alarm.